Subscribe to feed

Posts Tagged ‘communications’

Genie alertIf you own or operate a Genie Z-80 Boom Lift, especially a model within the following range of serial numbers  – Z80-101 to Z8009-2448 – contact your Genie dealer for more information.

Genie Industries has determined that the above referenced machines were produced with the wrong floor loading information in the operator’s manual and on the decals. This information indicates that the maximum wheel load is less than the actual maximum wheel load. Incorrect floor loading information may result in the user operating the machine on a surface that is not capable of supporting the maximum wheel load.

If you are the owner or operator of an affected machine and are not an authorized Genie dealer, please contact your nearest Genie dealer for assistance.

Genie and ANSI requires that the seller of a Genie machine report to Genie the model and serial number of each machine sold, as well as the name, address, and telephone number of the new owner, within 60 days of the sale. OSHA and ANSI also require that the manufacturer’s campaign bulletins be completed. It is your responsibility to communicate this important information to all machine owners and applicable branches. If you have any questions, please contact Genie’s service department at:

Unites States 800-536-1800

Canada 425-881-1800

Europe +31 653 221 908

Australia 61 733751660

All other locations 001-425-881-1800

Contact Genie Industries, Inc., 18340 NE 76th Street Redmond WA 98052, Ph: 800-536-1800, 425-881-1800.

CPR AED“Good Samaritans show kindness to others and their good acts should be encouraged, rather than discouraged.” – Assembly Member Mike Feuer, co-author of AB 83 (revises Good Samaritan Law)

Many of us have heard of the Good Samaritan Law which protects individuals from lawsuits while voluntarily helping others in peril.  With the passing of Assembly Bill 83, Samaritans and medical personnel alike are now covered for giving medical care AND providing related assistance – such as rescuing the person from a hazardous environment.

Cal-OSHA Title 8 section 3400 states: “In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace, which is used for the treatment of all injured employees, a person or persons shall be adequately trained to render first aid.” The Good Samaritan law now covers those who attempt to provide medical assistance to help others in a workplace emergency, without fear of liability or reprisal.

Read more about the Good Samaritan Law.

Contact JB Safety & Rescue for help in understanding the Good Samaritan Law.

coil nailer recall

Nailers may cause serious injury hazard from faulty feeder.

WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Health Canada, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following products. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed.

Name of Product: Coil Nailers

Units: About 50,000 in the United States and about 15,000 in Canada

Importer: Hitachi Koki U.S.A., Ltd., of Norcross, Ga.

Manufacturer: Hitachi Koki Co. Ltd., of Japan

Hazard: The nailers could have a faulty feeder that can allow nails to be ejected sideways, posing a serious injury hazard to the user or bystanders.

Incidents/Injuries: The firm has received 37 reports of nails being ejected sideways, including 15 reports of injuries. The injuries were primarily in the eye region, including five reports of partial blindness.

Description: The coil nailers are used to project nails into drywall, wood or other materials. The model number is NV83A2 and can be found on the body of the product. Only those units manufactured between October 2002 and September 2005 are included in this recall. The manufacturing date can be identified by the serial number engraved at the end of the handle, the first digit representing the month (1 for January, 2 for February, 3 for March, 4 for April, 5 for May, 6 for June, 7 for July, 8 for August, 9 for September, O for October, N for November and D for December) and the second digit representing the year (2 for 2002, 3 for 2003, 4 for 2004 and 5 for 2005).

Sold at: Lowe’s, Home Depot, other home improvement and building supply stores and online at Amazon.com nationwide from November 2002 through March 2006 for between $350 and $400.

Manufactured in: Japan

Remedy: Consumers should immediately stop using the recalled coil nailer and contact Hitachi Koki U.S.A., Ltd. for a free repair.

Consumer Contact: For additional information, contact Hitachi Koki U.S.A., Ltd. at (800) 706-7337 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday or visit Hitatchi Power Tools.

Also see recall at the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Contact JB Safety & Rescue if you have any questions.

Fluke RecallMarch 8, 2010, San Diego, CA –Thanks to Bergelectric Corp. for providing the following  safety recall on an instrument that is critical to electrical safety.

In cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Fluke is voluntarily recalling its Fluke 1AC-I VoltAlert TM voltage tester, a product that was first released for sale on September 29, 2009. The affected model number is listed in the table below. If you own a Fluke 1AC-I (1AC-A1-I), stop using it and send it back to Fluke for a replacement unit.

If you are not the primary user of the 1AC-I please pass this notice along to the appropriate people within your organization.

Product:  FLUKE-1AC-I VoltAlertTM Voltage Tester

Product Marking: 1AC-AI

Problem: The testers can fail to give an indication of live voltage, resulting in the operator falsely believing the electrical power is off, posing a risk of serious injury or death from electrical shock or thermal burns.

It’s imperative that you:

Visit Fluke Recall or call (888) 97-FLUKE (35853), 6:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time Monday – Friday. Follow the instructions provided and Fluke will send you a prepaid mailer to return your unit at no cost.

Fixtures are intended for use in parking lots, roadways, commercial environments and office communities and are being recalled due to potential shock hazardrecall light fixtures

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has announced a voluntary recall by manufacturer as follows. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed.

Name of Product: Outdoor Lighting Fixtures

Units: About 900

Manufacturer/Distributor: American Electric Lighting, a division of Acuity Brands Lighting Inc., of Conyers, Ga.

Hazard: Improper wiring in the light fixtures poses a shock hazard to consumers.

Incidents/Injuries: None reported.

Description: This recall involves model AVL outdoor lighting fixtures sold under the American Electric Lighting brand name. The light fixtures are intended for use in parking lots, roadways, commercial environments and office communities. “AVL” is printed on the reflector of each light fixture.
Sold by: Electrical distributors and electrical sales representatives nationwide from September 2008 through September 2009 for between $250 and $800.

Manufactured in: Mexico

Remedy: Consumers should immediately disconnect power to the fixtures and contact American Electric Lighting to schedule a free inspection and repair.

Consumer Contact: For additional information, contact American Electric Lighting, or call (800) 754-0463 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday.

Ambulance Help Our Local Emergency Personnel Get the Message Out

Each time fire and other emergency personnel are called to respond to an emergency, it costs taxpayer dollars.  When the call is a false alarm, it still bears a cost and valuable taxpayer dollars are spent needlessly. And when the false alarm becomes a catalyst for accidents or other dangerous conditions, the costs can be deadly.

According to the National Fire Protection Association, more than six thousand false fire alarms occur in the United States each day…and the number is increasing.

A public service announcement to bring false alarm calls to the public’s attention is helping to get the message out.  According to its producer, Richard Lambert, a 60 second PSA was posted online last February and fire departments throughout the country have participated in getting it aired.

Lambert says, “Over five hundred TV stations ran the PSA after receiving it by email and our online tracking shows that it’s continuing.” Lambert adds, “Fire departments everywhere are looking for ways to make their communities safer without adding expense. This PSA is a good tool for that.”

We encourage you to share this PSA by emailing this link to your family, friends and coworkers.  Let’s all do our part to help get the message out and save precious taxpayer dollars for real emergency situations.

Watch the PSA.

If passed, law not only taxes the already tax-overburdened ’small business,’ but is considered unlikely to generate little, if any, revenue for the State.

As a small business owner, I am vehemently opposed to the State’s latest proposal to require businesses to withhold 3 percent of payments to independent contractors.  Below is a call to action, opposing the State’s proposition, provided by the California Chamber of Commerce.  I hope you will join with me and hundreds of others in supporting the coalition to put an end to this ridiculous piece of legislation.  I’m also including the full version of an excellent article regarding the legislation, and a link to the entire article on CalChamber’s website.

Your Action Is Needed to Help Stop This Legislation From Passing!

View and Download Fact Sheet

(Click on graphic to view and download printable fact sheet.)

The CalChamber is urging members to call or write their legislators to voice opposition to independent contractor withholding.

Business people can find a fact sheet and sample letter, or look up their legislators or legislators’ telephone numbers at www.calchambervotes.com.

To join the opposition coalition, e-mail Laurie Lively.

Staff Contact: Kyla Christoffersen

Reprint of article from the California Chamber of Commerce Website

February 16, 2010) Spearheaded by the California Chamber of Commerce, the coalition opposing a proposal to require businesses to withhold 3 percent of payments to independent contractors is growing rapidly.

In just days after inviting CalChamber members via e-mail to sign onto the opposition coalition, the list of opposing organizations and companies more than quadrupled, topping 800 entities from throughout the state.

Other business and industry associations also are actively participating in an intensive effort to educate legislators that independent contractor withholding will harm millions of companies and agencies, kill jobs and hurt the California economy.

Onerous Mandate

The coalition is warning that independent contractor withholding places a maximum burden on businesses for a minimal return. It will amount to an interest-free loan to the state from small businesses—an onerous, never-ending mandate that is a one-time money-grab. It will not yield new revenue, but merely accelerate income tax payments already owed or bring in monies that will have to be refunded to businesses that don’t owe any income tax.

The Senate Budget Committee was poised to vote on a budget package that included independent contractor withholding. The idea seems appealing to lawmakers who mistakenly believe it can help address the state’s chronic budget deficit.

Who Must Withhold?

Companies, non-profit organizations and local and state agencies all would be required to implement the withholding, the coalition is pointing out in a one-page fact sheet being circulated widely.

Who Will See Money Withheld?

Independent contractors are self-employed individuals and businesses, ranging from small businesses and entrepreneurs to large firms.

Examples of operations that will see money withheld from payments to them include: builders, painters, plumbers, real estate agents, insurance agents, computer programmers, accountants, automotive mechanics, attorneys, doctors and other health care providers, engineers, gardeners, janitors, security guards and entertainers.

As businesses, independent contractors pay more kinds of taxes than employees, such as self-employment taxes and local business taxes; pay income taxes throughout the year through quarterly estimated tax payments; and are subject to penalties for not paying or underpaying.

Because of recent budget agreements, independent contractors already must pay 70 percent of their taxes by June of each year for the next two years.

Threatens Small Business

In a year when the Governor and legislative leaders have indicated that “jobs, jobs, jobs” is a top priority, independent contractor withholding will destroy rather than create California jobs.
CalChamber opposition to independent contractor withholding is based on the following:

  • Independent contractors already have a greater tax burden than employees;
  • Withholding will wrongly force small businesses to loan money to the state, interest-free;
  • Withholding could generate little if any new revenue for the state; and
  • Withholding targets the wrong group of taxpayers—taxpayers who are already compliant. These taxpayers already are providing the state information it can use to target independent contractors who aren’t paying income taxes they owe.

Action Needed

The CalChamber is urging members to call or write their legislators to voice opposition to independent contractor withholding.

Business people can find a fact sheet and sample letter, or look up their legislators or legislators’ telephone numbers at www.calchambervotes.com.

To join the opposition coalition, e-mail laurie.lively@calchamber.com.

Staff Contact: Kyla Christoffersen

Cal-OSHA also requires that every employer shall adopt a written Code of Safe Practices which relates to the employer’s operations. The Code shall contain language equivalent Appendix C (below), and shall be posted at a conspicuous location at each job site office or be provided to each supervisory employee who shall have it readily available.safety_first_picture

Appendix C – Code of Safe Practices

(This is a suggested code. It is general in nature and intended as a basis for preparation by the contractor of a code that fits his operations more exactly.)

  1. All persons shall follow these safe practice rules, render every possible aid to safe operations, and report all unsafe conditions or practices to the foreman or superintendent.
  2. Foremen shall insist on employees observing and obeying every rule, regulation, and order as is necessary to the safe conduct of the work, and shall take such action as is necessary to obtain observance.
  3. All employees shall be given frequent accident prevention instructions. Instructions shall be given at least every 10 working days.
  4. Anyone known to be under the influence of drugs or intoxicating substances that impair the employee’s ability to safely perform the assigned duties shall not be allowed on the job while in that condition.
  5. Horseplay, scuffling, and other acts that tend to have an adverse influence on the safety or well-being of the employees shall be prohibited.
  6. Work shall be well planned and supervised to prevent injuries in the handling of materials and in working together with equipment.
  7. No one shall knowingly be permitted or required to work while the employee’s ability or alertness is so impaired by fatigue, illness, or other causes that it might unnecessarily expose the employee or others to injury.
  8. Employees shall not enter manholes, underground vaults, chambers, tanks, silos, or other similar places that receive little ventilation, unless it has been determined that is safe to enter.
  9. Employees shall be instructed to ensure that all guards and other protective devices are in proper places and adjusted, and shall report deficiencies promptly to the foreman or superintendent.
  10. Crowding or pushing when boarding or leaving any vehicle or other conveyance shall be prohibited.
  11. Workers shall not handle or tamper with any electrical equipment, machinery, or air or water lines in a manner not within the scope of their duties, unless they have received instructions from their foreman.
  12. All injuries shall be reported promptly to the foreman or superintendent so that arrangements can be made for medical or first aid treatment.
  13. When lifting heavy objects, the large muscles of the leg instead of the smaller muscles of the back shall be used.
  14. Inappropriate footwear or shoes with thin or badly worn soles shall not be worn.
  15. Materials, tools, or other objects shall not be thrown from buildings or structures until proper precautions are taken to protect others from the falling objects.

Cal-OSHA Code of Safe Practices


Use the following Cal-OSHA guide to evaluate your company’s current IIPP. To make sure your IIPP meets the basic requirements, contact the experts at JB Safety & Rescue Services for an on-site evaluation of your health and safety program. We can help evaluate your program from documentation to your entire worksite – and help you identify areas of concern, or where more training is needed.

iipp

  • Does the written Injury and Illness Prevention Program contain the elements required by Section 3203(a) (which makes it mandatory for employers to “establish, implement and maintain an effective Injury and Illness Prevention Program”)?
  • Are the person or persons with authority and responsibility for implementing the program identified?
  • Is there a system for ensuring that employees comply with safe and healthy work practices (i.e., employee incentives, training and retraining programs, and/or disciplinary measures)?
  • Is there a system that provides communication with affected employees on occupational safety and health matter (i.e., meetings, training programs, posting, written communications, a system of anonymous notification concerning hazards and/or health and safety committees)?
  • Does the communication system include provisions designed to encourage employees to inform the employer of hazards at the worksite without fear of reprisal?
  • Is there a system for identifying and evaluating workplace hazards whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced to the workplace and whenever the employer receives notification of a new or previously unrecognized hazard?
  • Were workplace hazards identified when the program was first established?
  • Are periodic inspections for safety and health hazards scheduled?
  • Are records kept of inspections made to identify unsafe conditions and work practices, if required?
  • Is there an accident and near-miss investigation procedure?
  • Are unsafe or unhealthy conditions and work practices corrected expeditiously, with the most hazardous exposures given correction priority?
  • Are employees protected from serious or imminent hazards until they are corrected?
  • Have employees received training in general safe and healthy work practices?
  • Do employees know the safety and health hazards specific to their job assignments?
  • Is training provided for all employees when the training program is first established?
  • Are training needs of employees evaluated whenever new substances, processes, procedures, or equipment are introduced to the workplace and whenever the employer receives notification of a new or previously unrecognized hazard?
  • Are supervisors knowledgeable of the safety and health hazards to which employees under their immediate direction and control may be exposed?
  • Are records kept documenting safety and health training for each employee by name or other identifier, training dates, type(s) of training and training providers?
  • Does the employer have a labor-management safety and health committee?
  • Does the committee meet at least quarterly?
  • Is a written record of safety committee meetings distributed to affected employees and maintained for Division review?
  • Does the committee review results of the periodic, scheduled worksite inspections?
  • Does the committee review accident and near-miss investigations and, where necessary, submit suggestions for prevention of future incidents?
  • When determined necessary by the committee does it conduct its own inspections and investigations, to assist in remedial solutions?
  • Does the committee verify abatement action taken by the employer as specified in Division citations upon request of the Division?

Language To Consider Incorporating in Your Company’s Health and Safety Documentation or IIPPIIPP high hazard

Cal-OSHA provides the following ‘language’  for employers to consider using in developing or updating an IIPP.  While there are no requirements to use this language word for word, we’re providing these model statement to help you review and evaluate your current IIPP.

To make sure your IIPP meets the basic requirements, contact the experts at JB Safety & Rescue Services for an on-site evaluation of your health and safety program. We can help evaluate your program from documentation to your entire worksite – and help you identify areas of concern, or where more training is needed.

“The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, clearly states our common goal of safe and healthful working conditions to be the first consideration in operating this business.”

“Safety and health in our business must be part of every operation. Without questions, it is every employee’s responsibility at all levels.”

“It is intent of this company to comply with all laws. To do this, we must constantly be aware of conditions in all work areas that can produce injuries. No employee is required to work at a job he/she knows is not safe or healthful. Your cooperation in detecting hazards and, in turn, controlling them, is a condition of your employment. Inform your supervisor immediately of any situation beyond your ability or authority to correct.”

“The personal safety and health of each employee of this company is of primary importance. Prevention of occupationally-induced injuries and illnesses is of such consequence that it will be given precedence over operating productivity, whenever necessary. To the greatest degree possible, management will provide all mechanical and physical activities required for personal safety and health, in keeping with the highest standards.”

“We will maintain a safety and health program conforming to the best practices of organizations of this type. To be successful, such a program must embody proper attitudes toward injury and illness prevention on the part of supervisors and employees. It also requires cooperation in all safety and health matters, not only between supervisor and employee, but also between each employee and his/her co-workers. Only through such a cooperative effort can a safety program in the best interest of all be established and preserved.”

“Our objective is a safety and health program that will reduce the number of injuries and illnesses to an absolute minimum, not merely in keeping with, but surpassing, the best experience of operations similar to ours. Our goal is zero accidents and injuries.”

“Our safety and health program will include:

  • Providing mechanical and physical safeguards to the maximum extent possible.
  • Conducting safety and health inspections to find, eliminate or control safety and health hazards as well as unsafe working conditions and practices, and to comply fully with the safety and health standards for every job.
  • Training all employees in good safety and health practices.
  • Providing necessary personal protective equipment, and instructions for use and care.
  • Developing and enforcing safety and health rules, and requiring that employees cooperate with these rules as a condition of employment.
  • Investigating, promptly and thoroughly, every accident to find out what caused it and correct the problem so it will not happen again.
  • Setting up a system of recognition and awards for outstanding safety service or performance.”

“We recognize that the responsibilities for safety and health are shared:

  • The employer accepts the responsibilities for leadership of the safety and health program, for its effectiveness and improvement, and for providing the safeguards required to ensure safe conditions.
  • Supervisors are responsible for developing proper attitude toward safety and health in themselves and in those they supervise, and for ensuring that all operations are performed with the utmost regard for the safety and health of all personnel involved, including themselves.
  • Employees are responsible for wholehearted, genuine operation of all aspects of the safety and health program-including compliance with all rules and regulations and for continuously practicing safety while performing their duties.”

California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 3023 (Injury and Illness Prevention Program)

Download Prevention Model Program for High Hazard Employers

Download Prevention Model for Non-High Hazard Employers

Download Prevention Model for Employers with Intermittent Workers